Opening Day is Opening Day

Happy Baseball everyone!

I can no longer open Opening Day on Opening Day, so I settled for the next best thing, I guess — opening some more Series One.

The cards I most want to see on Opening Day are of course, cards from My Team, and Topps came through:

Now here was a nice burst of optimism - a bright sunny baseball card for the player Tigers fans hope will win the Comeback Player of the Year award after a straight up disintegration last year as Bad Luck seemed to attack Meadows from every direction.

Usually I figure pulling a player's brand new baseball card on Opening Day is going to be an excellent omen both on Opening Day and going forward. And today that did not disappoint: Meadows went 3-for-4 with a Double and two Singles.

Tigers cards this year are going to occasionally fool people into wondering: what the heck happened to Kris Bryant? And how did he end up in Detroit before whatever happened? The "KB" shoulder patch the Tigers wore for the 2022 season was a memorial tribute for Kimera Bartee, who died unexpectedly during the off-season some 15 months ago, shortly after being named the Tigers new regular First Base Coach. Bartee played Center Field for the Tigers for most of one season in the mid-90s; a season which mostly eluded my baseball card collecting efforts.

For today's festivities I purchased 2 36-card "fat" / "value" packs but I doubt that second appellation will be used much any more. This type of packaging has been absent from retail baseball cards for a few years now and I am happy to see it return, for use in stores that decline to offer the regular single/loose pack of 16 cards. These "value" packs now cost $9.99 where I live and are actually one of the more expensive ways to purchase cards, on a per-card basis. Blasters have a slightly higher per-card cost, but the $4 16-card pack is a better deal (added one of those to the menu today as well) and the 72-card "hanger" box is still the best deal overall, though hangers hand up the duplicate strings of cards at a much faster clip.

One Detroit Tigers card isn't enough for Opening Day however; there had to be more amidst 88 cards and 30 teams, I hope -

Did I pull today's starting Pitcher? Nope. Brieske had to open the season on the IL after seemingly earning a bullpen spot as a "swingman" ready to jump in the rotation as soon as necessary (presumably quite soon given how MLB Pitching works in the 2020s) after an accelerated Rookie season as a starter last year, made necessary by how MLB Pitching works these days. Naturally, given the workings of Pitching lately, his Rookie year was shortened by injury as well. At least I have another nice sunny Tigers card to enjoy while he joins most every other recent young Tigers starter working through the rehab process to try Pitching again, someday.

2-for-2 on bright sunny baseball cards though, could Topps keep this bright motif going?

womp womp womp

This has got to be the most Sad Trombone card I have pulled in a while. This is my first Tigers duplicate this year after I pulled it on a different Opening Day - the Opening Day of 2023 Baseball Card season back in February. As I mentioned then, the head shot on these cards can really swoop in and rescue a mediocre baseball card like this one. And maybe this poor Rookie Card image will work reverse magic - Greene had a great Spring and could well be primed for a great Sophomore campaign and will hopefully anchor Center Field in Detroit for many seasons to come.

Going 3-for-88 on Tigers cards on Opening Day seemed just exactly perfect in a 30 team League and would actually be a BC+ score of somewhere  a bitover 100, a composite stat I just made up. Given some of the 86 cards being inserts, I beat the odds finding Tigers for a change — a rare thing in Topps checklists for quite a while now.

But I do always hope to see some cards of the opponents on this momentous baseball Day, and there Topps let me down as I found no Tampa Bay Rays to absorb, a BC+ of precisely 0 I guess. Thus the Tigers shoulda won today, 3-0 in true magic baseball card fashion? Nope. The ever-solid Rays beat My Team in workman like fashion with the same number of Hits as the boys from Motown, but 2 of theirs were Home Runs. Sigh.

Now the other thing I love to do on Opening Day with all my brand new baseball cards is figure out how accurate the cards are - does the card in my hand have a matching line in a Box Score today? Who plays this game, anyway? That's why I buy the baseball cards. 

Given that so many brand new baseball cards are Rookie Card cards these days, I decided to siphon those off my nice little 88 card pile of baseball information and see what's happening with the New Guys. That idea was prompted by this outstanding baseball card:

Did he make the Box Score? Yes. However that was neither as an SS or a 3B but rather at DH. I have no idea who played those 2 positions for the Orioles so clearly I will need some more brand new baseball cards. The O's are a young team and it can take me a few years of reading baseball cards to get a good handle on such clubs.

I'm still only lukewarm on these 2023 Topps Baseball Cards with all the odd geometry but the clear view of each player's face down there in the bottom left corner sure does make for excellent Rookie Cards. Like all Topps designs, the picture of the baseball player is the most significant element of the card, ultimately. It will take me a while yet to decide on collecting or not collecting this set in it's entirety. I do like to know what the players look like, and Topps comes through on that point this year in a very well-done way. 

For the rest of these 'rooks, I will go with a purely fair alphabetical order:

Did he make the Box Score? Yes. I am still a little shaky on Red Sox players since last year on the Opening Day wrapper there were 2 Red Sox that I still can't identify with certainty. Casas was a first round draft pick for Boston & in general the back of the card paints a bright future ahead here. This card again shows off the value of the bonus head-shot given the way the new 2020s batting helmets reduce face visibility in live action photos. Overall a solid find in a pack of brand new baseball cards. Unlike this next Red Sox card...

Did he make the Box Score? Nope. Nor for his new team. There was no way Topps was going to pass up their opportunity to finally make this baseball card, given Downs' first name. Even though the Red Sox DFA'd him before Christmas. Maybe, and that is a weak maybe, we will see him in Update sporting a Nationals uniform. You can't win 'em all and in the Rookie Card card era, some checklist spots are just a Sac Fly so the RC logo can appear in every pack and everyone can feel like they "got something" worth money, somehow. Topps is keeping the sun shine going at least -

Did he make the Box Score? No. A bit of a surprise to me, given what the back of this card tells me: 2.1 WAR in a little more than half a season's worth of Rookie Year games last year. I had to choose carefully tonight; rather than checking in with Tom Hamilton on the Cleveland radio broadcast I selected the A's broadcast instead. I like that radio crew a lot, too — plus Topps advertises on A's broadcasts regularly. Some other day with a Guardians game on the radio or some future set of baseball cards might tell me more about this cheerful looking baseball player I have never seen before. Another solid new baseball card, which kept right on appearing today:

Did he make the Box Score? Yes. This player I was familiar with in the more regular way - from following games. Given KC's co-habitation with Detroit in the AL Central cellar lately, I probably pay more attention to Tigers-Royals games, given that the Tigers have a better chance to win those. If memory serves, the Royals basically fielded their 2023 squad routinely last September; in general an optimistic set of names. This does fail to explain why I didn't know who Oscar Gonzalez was however. 

And there are plenty of "divisional" games, or were, as those have been dropped from 18-19 to 13-14 such games this year. This will make baseball cards even more important to me in helping me follow the teams in my own division given two less series against each this year. I like how this card mixes up the photo style on the head shot; I hope there are more of these. I'm ready for more boys of summer, always frequently seen on Chicago cards -

Did he make the Box Score? No. I do know most of the Cubs players, courtesy mostly of Topps baseball cards, but an "OF" has room for 3, so - this was a could-go-either-way prediction, based on what the back of this card tells me. I expect I will see this player on more baseball cards and it is now a given that My Team will automatically play the Cubs, whenever that is, so maybe by that time he will be in a game I catch. I am ready, now, when his name is called. Meanwhile that lucky old sun just keeps rolling around in my "value" packs...

Did he make the Box Score? Not surprisingly at all, Nope. Another duplicate from my First Pack of 2023, I made that prediction with ease as soon as I saw this card 6 weeks ago, given how many Pirates middle infielder Rookie Card cards Topps handed me last year. I also couldn't check in with Bob Walk and Joe Black on the radio today for some Pirates news but that also wasn't necessary. The Pirates seem as doomed as ever to have large quantities of Rookie Card cards in my packs of baseball cards but despite that same-as-it-ever-was conclusion I still don't understand this particular baseball card. Three At Bats in a previous season should not a Rookie Card make, in my opine. It can't stay sunny every day of the baseball season I guess:

Did he make the Box Score? No. Although my 2023 First Card, A's Rookie Card card Catcher Shea Langeliers, is playing as I type, I didn't expect another RC Logo Catcher would appear today. The Rockies are near impossible for me to follow; I don't even have a clue who calls their games as if I am awake for a West Coast game I'm going to go with Jon Miller on the Giants game or the A's crew I am listening to right now. Baseball cards gave me just enough Rockies knowledge to know that Serven is likely the back-up Catcher, though he certainly earned a Rookie Card card after 62 games in The Bigs last year. I'm guessing this photo was taken early in a game, when the usual just-after-lunch set of clouds tends to drift across the Front Range — this card awakens some fond memories of life in Colorado though that flows also from another card in these packs. The West is so big, and baseball is more mysterious out there. I am always more grounded back in the Middle West -

Did he make the Box Score? That's a negatory. 9 At Bats last year so, you do the math. This is a great baseball picture card with the perfect photo truncation of Swaggerty's last name on his uniform and the excellent flowing lines that made me instantly turn it over to see how many Home Runs this player hit last year. Sigh; the answer was: zero. This is only a so-so baseball card, to my taste, given that pointlessly squished capital "P" there and all that weird geometry going all dizzy around it. Is that the secondary team color there around the home plate "OF" positional designation? Why can't that just be regular Pirate Yellow? Topps sure seems to love these unknown Pirates, considering they are enshrining them in baseball card history by giving them a checklist spot in The Topps Baseball set, my Gold Standard of baseball information, though I find myself ever more often wondering about that concept.

Not all Rookie Card cards can be Home Runs, even when they sorta come close like that last card. I have been slightly stacking this little deck of cards by showing all the hitters, which is because even the most rock solid young Pitchers can make an Opening Day starting rotation but not today's Box Score. So let's move on to the guys who start each & every "play" in the game of Baseball:

Did he make the team? Yes. I already knew from my numerous Rookie Card inserts last year who would be starting for Cincinnati today: Hunter Greene, recipient of much Topps love in 2022. I cheated and went to non-baseball card resources to confirm what this card suggests; 19 starts last year for Ashcraft, a very solid total for a Rookie. And quite a solid Reds Rookie Card card with Mr. Redlegs making an appearance, the requisite blurry red seats in Cincinnati, and a straight fantastic look at their official Team Socks. This one is likely to make the page I have showing off the best examples of each. Great set of lines on this card and a nice photograph obviously catching the live baseball game focus of Ashcraft. Who was that guy that was just complaining about this 2023 Topps Baseball design a paragraph back? I do love those empty seat cards Pitchers tend to get, and all the surreality that can go on behind them:

Did he make the team? Sort of - 40 Man roster. I like several things about this card. The uniform. The multi-color pastiche behind Hughes. The bright green grass and more horizontal-than-vertical lighting telling me this is a Night Card. Which is more intriguing because I have no idea what this Cubs uniform is. A Night Card from Wrigley? Throwback? New? Home? Away? The cap is obliterated by the stadium lights. Such a mystery. I will need more baseball cards to see something new (or old) for the Cubs, a very old baseball club. I will be watching.

I also like that this card exists - Hughes pitched 57 Innings out of the bullpen last year, and that is an accomplishment definitely worth a Rookie Card. Something I fret about when I pull Rookie Card cards like those very marginal Pirates cards. Relievers are baseball players too, even though they are far and away the most unpopular position on the roster. Only the Closer gets much appreciation from the fans, and only the near perfectly successful Closers on the level of Mariano get unrequited love. All other relievers can only lose the game for Their Team, in the minds of most fans. The Manager should have never changed the Pitcher, so obvious. Managers are always so dumb. They change the Pitcher and the team loses the game. No one wants Manager cards either.

I also like that Hughes is a Michigan born player. This will give me something to follow when the Cubs<>Tigers games appear sometime this year. The head shot on this one also appears not-posed, which is a good thing in this set. The Cubs routinely get great baseball cards. All that red, white, and blue - man I'm ready for some Apple Pie now. 

However I still have no idea why Hughes didn't make the 26 Man roster; baseball cards can't explain all baseball news of course. I still need those basic who-are-these-guys deets, particularly down on the South Side -

Did he make the team? Sort of - 40 Man roster. I count that as a quasi-yes because I feel sure there will be some Rookie Card cards in my packs this year featuring a player no longer on a 40 Man roster, if I were to investigate each one. Martin is a young work-in-progress Starter for the White Sox; I suppose 14 games last year, mostly Starts, is every bit as Rookie Card worthy as the Beau Briskie card for the Tigers. Both of their careers could go either way right now. 

I would note that this card also features a non-posed image for the head shot, but that doesn't work on this card as it seems to clearly use a live game image with a classic bit of "Pitcher's Face" so familiar from action image Topps Baseball Cards for decades now. These are not always complimentary for the subject. A strong image line flow from the glove to the baseball fortunately keeps one's gaze away from the weird mess that the bottom of 2023 Topps can distract the viewer into sometimes. The image reminds me of a Quarterback about to launch a Bomb way downfield though, which is weird. The dirt on the mound also adds to the weirdness here. Sorry, Davis, Rookies deserve better. Let's see if the Sun might come back out -

Did he make the team? Yes. And the Box Score. Although the back of the card seems to indicate Winckowski came up as a not-all-that-succesful-Rookie-Starter last year (probably more of those workings of modern Pitching for the Red Sox last year, too, I guess), today he threw a respectable inning out of the bullpen in Boston. But since the home team was already behind and indeed lost the game, few will remember that and my hunch is Josh Winckowski will pitch a good amount this year, but likely won't be seen on baseball cards again until 2024 Update, maybe.

I do always like the cards with the solid color Alternate Uniforms though I will never understand Topps strange desire to use just bits and pieces of team logos. This is another one where the solid photo selection and cheerful head shot create a nifty baseball card for me to follow the game of baseball with. I know well I will be soaking up another stack of these things, soon...

Staying on the train too long

I am still wrapping up some 2022 products but also still waiting for one - haven't bought any Stadium Club yet. I'm waiting for a "Sale" - i.e. a discount. The Big Box store where I live usually does a Buy One, Get One 50% off deal on sports cards one time in the winter, making them essentially 25% off. Stadium Club is now only available in blaster boxes, which are $30 at my only local baseball card source — that's about 80¢ per card just to get, I dunno, 30 base base cards since SC parallels and inserts are generally useless to me. That then makes each card I might keep cost a solid ONE DOLLAR, each, since most of the parallels and inserts won't be salable, either.

Nevertheless when the BOGO-50% sale on trading cards does arrive I will check out 2022 Stadium Club and hope to pull card #1 - the Shohei Ohtani card I already know I want. And I do like knowing I have that lottery ticket chance at hitting a card worth money, by buying sealed packs. But more importantly, I like acquiring some of my baseball cards randomly - let's-see-what-the-pack-delivers, rather than always deliberately shopping for them, singly.

So I am still on the Stadium Club train, when the cheaper tickets finally arrive, at least. But one product I am no longer on-board with has some similarities to SC in the useless parallels arriving with usually still appealing cards I want to keep. That product is Topps Gallery.

I have generally liked Topps Gallery ever since it's re-boot in 2017. I haven't liked it to set completion but one of those years, though I have always liked parts of each of those 5 sets enough to chip away at assembling those parts, and be happy with my purchases of retail baseball cards. I basically like this Roberto Clemente card here - I like the Pirates, Clemente is one of the most admirable figures in baseball history, I like photos shot at Shea Stadium, and I like baseball card photos from around the batting cage. And I like this clean, elegant design which is usually a hallmark of a Gallery release. One problem with this image in particular, however, is I already have a Clemente card using this same photo.

My true disappointment with this card, however, is especially disappointing when I like the basic design/framing of the photo. That's because — it is a photograph. That is a complete change to this product, so I am hopping off this train, though that decision is (maybe?) one $30 blaster too late.

I don't think Gallery has been all that popular most years, and not all of it sells on the retail shelves when new, because a lot of collectors just don't like "Art Cards." But, I do. I don't like every Art Card or every artist that makes them for Topps; I doubt anyone is ever going to like every style of Art. But, I like some of them.

So I was quite disappointed with this simple key fact about Gallery this year. There are still other Art Cards out there of course, but very few of them are offered in a set format like Gallery was. Rather, they are produced in limited quantities and thus every card costs $5 each, and, up. I love baseball cards, but not to the extent that I can or will spend > $5 on a card all that often despite my basic desire to do so pretty darn frequently.

Last year, the main "like" I had in Gallery was an insert set, "Modern Artists," which was created from illustrations drawn by Josh Trout, who's work I have particularly enjoyed in this product. This insert continued in 2022 -

Art by Jason Drumheller

This is, technically, artistic creation, but the art at hand is design work, not painting or drawing of Joey Votto - those are both photographs of Votto. These inserts also qualify as art because each of them are different, which is actually a basically quite interesting thing to do on the part of Topps. However seeing as Topps sends me more baseball card designs than I can even count already, I couldn't really get excited to collect 25, or even 9, individual card designs, even though many of them proved quite good when I scrolled through the other 24 examples. I -think- I would like to see this concept attempted again, but -maybe- it is a better one for the far more numerous Player Collectors, than a fit for my styles of collecting. I can't recall Topps ever issuing an insert run with a one-card, one-design composition.

With ever more and more baseball card products, I am quite content to just collect 9 copies of whatever it is and then enjoy. That is how I collect Stadium Club, and those parts of the last 5 years of Gallery that I have enjoyed. This year's Gallery did feature other baseball picture cards I quite liked and I felt I could almost assemble some page-mates for the Clemente card, like this one:

That would make a nice theme, 9 Hall of Famers on this simple elegant design, and I love that classic old Cardinals jersey there. But I feel that, probably, this Musial image is a repeat from other baseball cards, and I am certain some of the other HoFer's in the pack were repeats. So again the needle on my collecting Ouija board is moving towards dis-embark.

This same thought kept nagging at me, with each card I liked -

Hmmm, 9 interesting Rookie Card cards from this chillax design might be nice. It will be an interesting new season to see if Pittsburgh finally has a core middle infield that doesn't have to be "churned," for the first time since Mercer & Harris. So I was glad to pull another Rodolfo Castro RC, and I will be keeping this one on a page, somehow. But one thing Gallery does, just like Stadium Club, is it makes assembling like cards of cards I like into a process I don't like, because...

These I don't like.

I like colorful parallels, usually. But stamped parallels? And even though I quite like that perfect, full image of the Ray shoulder patch, something I do collect, I would not add this otherwise perfectly acceptable Wander Franco RC to a page with the Rodolfo Castro RC. I am not actually at all OCD in life, I just pretend like I am on a baseball card blog. But for whatever reason, I just can't add not-like cards together, even when I like them. Probably, the Wander RC will make it onto my page of good Rays shoulder patch cards, though that is approaching the magic number, 9, and it may finally be time for a count-down post to see which of 10 cards doesn't make the cut. 

Again and again I faced this same decision with this $30 stack of baseball cards, as here:

Another great card. Another intriguing Pirates Rookie to follow in the coming season. I always like what I call "Empty Seat" cards, and keep most of them. There aren't all that many such cards in a horizontal format, so that's where I hope this card will anchor a binder page, someday, but that is going to take a while to collect. My new all horizontal binder is taking shape nicely and I am already quite looking forward to a mid-winter, early-Spring-Training morning some years in the future when I sit down with a cup of coffee and start slowly paging though it. I will kind of wish this next card is in there...

That shows off another feature I have liked in Gallery - it arrives late in the season, and functions as good basic "Update" set for at least a few players every year. In fact this year it appeared earlier than ever, before Update even. This is one of Freeman's first Dodger cards, and is another very good baseball card. I was pleased to read that Night Owl needs this one the other day, so I hope it is still on his want list so I can give it a good home.

It would have gone very well with this next card -

- which is a fun card of a player I do collect. As with the Roansy Contreras card, I am hoping it can help make progress on an assemblage of 9 horizontal cards for 'Salvy' but I think that might be quite an uphill challenge to assemble 9 horizontals of a single player.

I did go into a bit of a 'cheat mode' and checked out my potential for finding 9 good horizontals from 2022 Gallery, but they were scarce in the checklist over all. Which is something I increasingly don't understand on the part of Topps - MUST every checklist include both vertical and horizontal cards together? The horizontals are frequently such a small component of a set that they feel like the tow-headed step-child fairly often, even though many horizontals are great baseball cards.

My search for possible horizontal page-mates for the previous 3 cards revealed this card to me:

Which just basically infuriated me all over again, as this is now the 3rd product I have discovered using this same exact fake backdrop, as in a recent post about this specific image. There are other backdrops like this, in other sets, and in this 2022 Gallery release as well. Quite a fall-down from a set that started out proud to use original art — I stayed on this train, too long. 

If I discover this image again in 2023 Heritage soon, which I feel is likely, my unconditional love of Topps products will become ever more conditional. Which means I will simply buy less of these fake baseball picture cards. The last thing I want from my curated collection of these images from a sport I love to follow is a reminder of our ever increasingly fake world. I am often quite thankful I work outdoors, where nothing is fake.

Unfortunately, the "Modern Artists" insert up there was the only insert example I pulled from my blaster; there are 3 other inserts in this. One of them, "Portrait Gallery," does feature original illustrations (i.e. color pencil work) by Dan Bergren, a long-time Gallery contributor who's work I also quite like and am collecting from other years of this product. I wish I had found one in my only purchase of this product as it would have cheered me up and possibly leaned me into trying to stay on the train. But as it stands I know I am just not up for spending > $50 or so just to assemble the 20 card checklist of his quite pleasing baseball art, mostly because his assigned checklist naturally includes all of the "Hot Rookies" of 2022, forcing up the price to see the art. Because, Rookies. 

I also wish I could summon the priorities to spend $20 on just 9 examples of his drawings, but I already spent > $20 hoping to find such examples, sigh. I did find a minor victory under the scratch-off box on my $30 lottery ticket however:

That's a /99 parallel for which I can probably receive $1.50 or so after fees, etc., when it someday arrives at COMC. I bought the ticket and took the ride. There is no escape from the concept; though bloggers and other collector-commentators elsewhere (including me) permanently whine about parallels and Rookie Card cards, I do perfectly understand why they are in products. Which is because the vast majority of collectors absolutely require that a package of baseball cards gives them something of "value" - something worth money - so every package must include something besides just boring old base cards. So Topps gives the customers what they want, as with this Verlander parallel. It is a distinct minority that just want baseball cards even when they aren't worth money later.

Despite my disappointment with 2022 Gallery in a general sense, I did receive some true "keeper" baseball cards that I will enjoy in years to come, so my $25 spent (after considering JV + Wander RC = $5 or so) did get me a few cards. One of them, I will have zero trouble assigning a home for, as it will live in my Tigers binder -

That's a brand new Detroit Tiger who greatly improved the value of this particular blaster of baseball cards, for me, when the new Tigers GM sensibly traded away his best Reliever, Gregory Soto, for a pair of basically Major-League-ready young players and one extra scratch-off ticket prospect. You don't need a bullpen when you don't have an offense, and it is the first Tigers trade in a long time that didn't involve simply dumping a "rental" contract with just 2 months to run. So that was a nice puff of comforting warm air near the Hot Stove a couple months back, a rare feeling for a Tigers fan.

I'm not sure I would have ever deliberately purchased this card though I will be naturally finding Vierling's regular RC in the Topps Baseball set at some collecting point. This is what I meant by the simple joy of assembling a baseball card collection, randomly. The Tiger's first Spring Training game is just a few days away as I write up this post, and Vierling will likely get his first Tigers At Bat, kinda-sorta. And I have his Rookie Card, ready to go. 

It's THAT day again!

Pitchers & Catchers? Nope. New Baseball Cards!

Let's take a look:

Wot?

That's my First Card this year, I think. It is definitely how I saw it, first. The cards in each pack arrived in a stack with the back facing outward - on both sides of the stack.

I am mostly positive this is the card that was on "top" of the pack - i.e. right there underneath Julio Rodriguez' massive forearm.

So, let's ponder the back first, since Topps kind of forced me to. This card back is highly functional. I quite like there being at least some of the text printed white-on-team color rather than black-on-white, so the vitals there are easy to read. Every other box is checked - team logo, player position, clean readable card # there in the corner. And, as far as I can tell, so far - all the card backs align the same way, with none flipped around. Hooray! It's the little things, the itty-bitty things. Let's never find cards with flipped backs ever again, please?

I don't quite understand why Topps continues to print the Twitter and Instagram symbols after they quit printing the players' Social Media names some years ago now. Will anyone forget @Topps if they don't print it on every card? But that's a terribly minor quibble. Let's flip this puppy over:

And we're off into a new season!

And like pretty much every First Card I can remember for quite a while now, my first thought is: Who IS this guy? But that's — OK. This is why I buy baseball cards. Surely this must be Oakland's proposed replacement for their excellent Catcher from last year, who they traded away, naturally, as is the order of things in Major League Baseball. The card back text up there even explains the deal when they traded away their excellent First Baseman last year, as is the order of things in MLB. It also notes he was a First Rounder for the Braves, so hope, and baseball cards, springs eternal, much like my First Card last year. Plus he wears cool socks.

My second thought is: 1983, right on schedule. This pure head-shot is even better than 1983, or 1963, or 2003. I like.

I can read the player name, a solid plus. I shouldn't even have to type that sentence, but after 2021...

....and after 2016 - did Topps learn nothing by obscuring half of the Team Logo? I don't get this. MLB Team Logos are solid pieces of graphic design that work best when presented in their entirety. An odd thing about them is they are often quite good at making other design elements near them look much more, hmmm, not-as-pro. Meanwhile they are so famous that even partially obscuring them still enables them to impart information, so no one needs to figure out the team name, which is good because this year that suffers from an outbreak of teeny-tinyness for, well, who knows why? Maybe Topps just resents being required to print the team name or something, I dunno.

I quite like the stars in 2 corners of the card, though they could easily be bigger, and bolder. Every MLB player is a star, really, to have reached the top level of their profession and appear on a Topps Baseball card. I also quite like the team color border. Though there again, I would go bigger and bolder, if I were in charge. More color = more better. I do like white border cards though. Clean, usually.

Topps also seems to be saying, hey, let's not forget 2020 & 2021 too fast now kids. Everyone likes a good parallelogram, right? I mean there's a word everyone thinks they won't need to ever use again once they graduate from 6th grade. Who remembers parallelograms? Topps remembers. So they just randomly add one to the bottom of the card, because, I guess, they can. Which always seems to explain a lot of graphics elements on Topps cards of the 2020s. And I guess this way the professional graders can just measure that bottom grey parallelogram to get the official T-B centering grade just exactly perfect.

And why don't all those parallelograms align out there on their right ends, like the left ends do? That whole area of the card is leading my eyes around in sort of a circle, but not, that ends in ... a triangle?

What does a triangle have to do with the game of baseball? It sure seems important considering how my gaze so easily ends up resting on it. At least the Positional element features Home Plate to remind me of the game of baseball. And I can read the Position this year. Hooray! It's the little things. That triangle though - I'm trying to think of any sport that uses a triangle, for anything, really, but I'm just not placing it. Baseball does use a diamond, which is kind of like 2 triangles after all, so, there's always next year for that idea, hint, hint. Maybe - Moto-Cross? Is there going to be a collision in the right corner of the card? I'm still going around in angular circles, whatever those are, or whatever is happening down there.

Overall, another not-so-cleanly effort this year. Functionality is good, but distraction is bad. Stars are good though, so I will give this one ☆☆☆✰ out of ☆☆☆☆☆. Conveying thought with graphics is hard - that's a 3.5 on a 5 scale. Last year I used a school grade for this, but I changed my mind on that as the baseball card season went along, but that's another post for another Night.

As they say, these baseball card designs always grow on you, and it's a long, long way till Update uses this design with who knows how many other products this year — baseball cards are a marathon, not a race. Let's get out past the starting block:

Cedric Mullins was my Second Card last year, too. That worked out pretty good for the Birds. I'm quite starting to like Cedric Mullins, and that's just because of baseball cards.

The constricted Team Logo here delivers an interesting tidbit - I somehow forgot the cap the Oriole is wearing features an authentic script O's just like on their black Alternate caps they wear on about every 11th baseball card Topps issues for them. Neat.

Orange & Black are a great color combo for a baseball team and they look good on a baseball card, which is good, cuz -

I can never remember who this guy Pitches for until I get his new baseball card. Which is why I buy them. I just randomly hope he is still pitching for the Giants — a common question in Series One.

This card has well composed lines with the card design and image cropping. Looks like an overcast day at Candlestick, which seems right. And I always like a card which shows off a Pitcher's grip on the ball. Bonus point for first authentic smile.

The Giants Team Logo comes off OK here, plus it features a baseball, always a solid choice. But I have wondered for a long, long time - does Topps really use official Team Logos? Or do they just kind of randomly pick from the team's various graphics they display on their caps (not here) or, just how this works? Do MLB teams have an official Team Logo? 

I purchased some Hobby packs today, and these will feature 14 cards this year, so pondering the Team Logos and 2023 Topps and baseball card history will have to wait. Tomorrow, is another Night. And next up, we have -

Another A's Rookie!

Is this 2019 again? That year I pulled A's Rookie Card cards out of pack after pack of baseball cards, and now, none of them play for the A's any more.

This card has a great photo element, seen much more easily, in-hand - the Ray Fosse memorial patch. I miss him on A's broadcasts.

This card also has an odd photo element - Jonah's right hand, perfectly centered. It looks like the camera may have tuned the focus on that hand, rather than the rest of Jonah. Overall, it has a weird 3-D effect that is a bit spooky. Much like the Oakland A's season is looking to be yet again. Topps picked this 23rd round draft pick to play Third Base this year after a 0.1 WAR campaign last year but the A's went out and signed a couple other 3Ber's instead, which I think is the "R" part of the WAR stat, in action. Oops. At least I have another Rookie Card card! Hooray! Let's move on to...

A playoff team!

Another authentic smile. Human beings can discern that in photographs when they try.

This Team Logo fares just OK amidst the constricted design. Also, I don't know if that is an official Team Logo or just their long-time uniform shoulder patch. Some teams get the shoulder patch, some get the cap logo. At least the Mets patch/Logo features a Baseball, and team colors and an apropos bridge, and ... I just wish I could see the whole thing. Let's try again -

Bazinga!

My very own favorite baseball team's very own hot Rookie Card card. Riley Greene could still turn out to be pretty darn good. Last year, he banged a Foul Ball into his foot during Spring Training or he would have been a starter on Opening Day. Ultimately, I think that might have worked out OK for him as it gave opposing teams less time to "write the book" on him - i.e. mine the data to figure out where the hole in his swing might be. This year he will have a new hitting coach, too, so the sky's the limit. I got my best possible Rookie Card in my first pack of baseball cards! We're gonna win 72 games this year! Hooray!

Let's just not ponder the sad fate of the olde English D Team Logo there however, quite a butchery, which is probably an olde English word. Nor look too long at sad Riley, who seems to have just banged a dribbler into the dirt, making a not so good omen for a Rookie Card — his first and only Rookie Card so far, even; should we maybe designate some cards as FRC for First Rookie Card? On this card, the 63/83/03/23 bonus picture comes through just in the nick of time. I like. However, it seems time for another authentic smile, maybe:

Wot?

I just pulled the A's new Catcher as my very First Card. So I thought maybe Topps well knew Murphy would be long gone from the sad city by the other side of the Bay by now. I mean, they wouldn't issue a Rookie Card of a back-up Catcher in the Topps Baseball set, would they?

Oh well, Series One is always Series One in this regard. I like how this card shows off a clear view of the PitchCom device on Murphy's left fore-arm. I look forward to seeing it in even more of a close-up on more 2023 baseball cards. But I can't say I am looking forward to more Oakland A's baseball cards this year, cuz the AAAA teams are a bummer...

...speaking of which.

Last year I got bunches of cards of yet more Pittsburgh Pirate middle-infielder Rookie Card cards, which have been appearing in droves for years. And I thought those 2 guys, Rodolfo Castro and O'Neil Cruz, would likely "stick" at the positions. But maybe, Topps doesn't think so? The one thing this card assures me of, is that I will never know who works out of the Pirate's bullpen, because surely printing Rookie Card cards of AA players is more important. Maybe that actually is best for the AAAA league teams, so when they finally start to Star in The Show and move to a real, "big market" club, everyone can have cheap Rookie Cards of those players to track down.

At least I got another cheerful sunny day baseball card, which was nice as yet another snowstorm rolled on to my baseball card mission today. And some cool shades. Let's just not think about that squashed letter "P" though, and see who's next:

Ooohh, shiny.

This might be a year I keep more of the Foil cards than usual, I'm already thinking. The Foil version of 2023 Topps Baseball has a couple nice quirks - the 2 stars in the corner are filled in by the foil-ing, so they show up much better. Meanwhile, that weird triangle doesn't shine in the foil, making it easier to forget.

On this card, I quite like the grease spot on Benintendi's right leg - authentic. The Yankees Team Logo is a classic, somewhat like the Mets Logo we just saw but is one that does not appear on their uniforms outside of a few rare occasions (some All-Star Games). Also as with the Mets, it would look much better if it could be fully seen. The whole idea worked perfectly fine in 1985 Topps, so I'm failing to comprehend as I fall back, back towards 2016 Topps...

sigh

This card does feature fairly good composition of a Pitcher pitching and it shows off an odd trivia: the uniform # on the back of Singer's shoe. I can't recall ever seeing that on a baseball card. 

Despite the solid image framing this would also have been a nice photo to crop in heavily on, as Singer is wearing a unique patch that you can only pick up by zooming in on a scan, from MLB's Lou Gehrig Day to support ALS research. Hopefully we will see this patch on some more cards with a more clear view, and I expect that will happen. I also wonder how many more Pitchers with shoes in the air can appear in one set of baseball cards -

That's 3 in one pack, surely a record. I will probably build a little pile of these to show off in the year 2025, when I get caught up on all my baseball card bloggling ideas. Maybe.

Lugo seems to have an authentically not authentic smile here, chez New York. Let's see where else this pack of cards can take me:

Here at least the Marlin gets a solid on-card appearance, a graphic item often hard to discern on Miami baseball cards. It appears Topps isn't sure what the Marlins' secondary team color should be though, which is pretty much the same for the rest of us with this team that just can't quit fiddling with it's iconography anyway. I will like seeing the Fish right there on the front of the card for a change though, and it even looks like it's swimming around in the water giving the whole Team Logo some basic accuracy, somehow.

Mostly though that card just makes me hope that Sanchez' team-mate Sixto makes it back to the Bigs from a long injury rehab, because who doesn't want a baseball card with the name Sixto on it? 

And as I ponder that card more, I realize it is my first card with 2 smiles on it. I like base-running cards and this one is in the running for my favorite in this pack, even after my key Tigers RC find. Two contenders to go on that question...

Solid baseball card.

Sunny day, great lines in the photo, nice smile. Even the little blue triangle is starting to feel OK on this one. I hope the photogs in Texas are able to get as many good shots of DeGrom as the ones in New York have over the last ten years of baseball cards. And, finally, a Star. Every pack of baseball cards needs a Star in it -

Even a potentially fading Star is OK. Because that is part of what baseball is all about - can this baseball player make it? Can he hit the next Pitch?

Betcha didn't know the Dodgers secondary team color was a faded pink though; the scan actually cleans that up in this regard as compared to in-hand. The Dodgers have another classic Team Logo never seen on their uniforms (that I can think of at least) that looked fantastic in 1985 when seen in full. 

This year, 2016 + 2020 ≠ 1983 in it's clean, colorful simplicity.

Another extra sunny day on that Bellinger card, which makes 4 in this pack of 14 cards. Perhaps 2023 Topps Baseball will be a rather more sunlit set, as some sets are. This pack certainly prepped me for the first Spring Training broadcast, now just 8 days away, despite another extra white, cold day where I live. And ultimately regardless of who appears on a Topps Baseball card or how much the design moves me or repels me, I always enjoy the new baseball information the cards bring me, and the potential they represent. Thus for me, it's always sunny on Topps Baseball Cards.

Shallow Fakes

The genesis may have come from a photo shoot in the dramatic Spring Training of the dramatic year of 20, 20.

Cards from photographs taken in the Spring sometimes appear later that season, first in Archives -

I like how Allen is standing in front of a shaded part of a "baseball field" but he is in bright sunshine.

They also might appear in Heritage High Numbers:

I think this one might actually be from an image roster in MLB: The Show

Now to be a tiny bit fair to Topps, cards in 2021 releases had to be made from photographs "supposedly" taken during the peak of the virus impacts, which pro sports had to take quite seriously.

How that might have worked in Spring Training, 2021, I can no longer remember.

The results for the Cleveland ball club that arrived with 2021 Heritage High Numbers

however, are quite memorable when held altogether, and, simultaneously not memorable at all:

That guy is pretty good, by the way.

And that's his Rookie Card. $.

Good luck with the next two:

The next year, Plesac has so much Mojo, he brought the cool clouds back with him, too. But you probably already forgot you just saw a Plesac card:

Hey guys, that looks epic back there, can I come over to visit?

My friend Max isn't really into reporting in Port St. Lucie this year, Brad says:

The cool thing about this baseball Mecca of the Cleveland back fields in AZ is all the other visitors.

Time Travelers, even.

all kinds of decades, too

the Sun maybe shined brighter back in '78?

I figure writing the new team names in the 78 script was soooo much work down in the Topps baseball card mines, the miners were given a break after a while.

But look man, except for Max up there, none of those cats are going to the Hall of Fame,

So, what?

(you'd be surprised how few cards of that guy stay in inventory lately)

Yeah, yeah, Nobody cares about Hall of Fame cards after retirement, anyway.

Who cares what those look like?

We want Rookie Cards!

That's what everyone remembers for every player.

yeah, yeah, base cards are dumb and boring, we all know that

we want those rare cards, limited editions, inserts!

Anyone else wanna make a rule that the Rays can't have any more players named "Lowe" ?

whatevs.

Nobody collects any of those 'rooks.

They are just in the packs so all 9 players can be on the field for when The Natural comes up to bat, the guy who's cards put $20 bills in my packs of baseball cards. Those are the important ones:

You may want to run my writings lately through the new Chatbot Detector app that is blowing up right now. It seems that Humanity has grown tired of composing the written word, so it has put Artificial Intelligence to use to now write long (and short) essays that no one reads any more anyway. So just the other day a coder put together his own AI based program to detect the output of the AI Chatbot. Might keep human writing on the up and up for another year or two, I guess.

But I don't think anyone will ever put together an App to find baseball cards like these. For me, these were just low-hanging fruit here. I even cheated and just downloaded the images I didn't have (most of them) in my own collection from Trading Card Database (thanks, peeps!) which I otherwise never do when composing a blog entry, about my own authentically owned baseball cards. But seemed like the authentic way to go here, while looking at anything but authentic baseball cards.

I find that run of cards basically disturbing, and insulting. Even though that with certain cards - to borrow one more I don't have from TCDB -

- software is already heavily involved in their creation.

And that's fine. Some great cards arrive using tech tools. Moving up to the top on my gonna-collect-em list are some mid-90s Pacific Prisms - you wanna talk about Oooohhhh, Shiny — whoa. 

I also look forward to owning a few Cosmic Chrome cards, maybe, though I would in no way choose to prioritize my money on a whole box of the stuff ($250 to start and now climbing over $400, I believe - for 80 cards), nor even have any chance to even buy a sample pack, either. The bottomless well of baseball cards today is a topic I will come back to sometime soon when I check out another blaster pile I have sitting on my card desk.

Overall for the basic idea of "Baseball Picture Cards" I don't know what the cards shown above might portend. On one hand, going forward in Heritage, there will, by the basic concept of the product, be a lot more live game action images on the cards, as mid & late 70s sets freely mixed action, posed, and candid images. So in theory these pitiful shenanigans seen here shouldn't be an option on as many cards, at least, as when Topps re-enacts sets that were 95% or more posed images, before the 1973 set, and that -should- help. I will actually have some good news on that idea here soon when I get back to just enjoying brand new Topps baseball cards.

But on the other hand, you can't fake a photograph from a real-live game of Major League Baseball, can you? I think the answer now is, yes, you probably can - thus the title of this post; I hope you all know what "Deep Fakes" are. If you don't, I do think it is an important concept for basically all humans to understand as Moore's Law continues to operate in the 2020s and if you haven't heard either set of 2 capitalized words in this paragraph put together before, well then you know what to do. 

Before the "AI Chatbot" started littering the Internet with fake prose many weeks ago now, "AI Art" was the fun toy of the moment on everyone's screens. I expect that will return soon enough as no one wants to waste their time reading words any more when another funny video just arrived in your "feed." And thus logically the coming Internet sensation will be "AI's Funniest Cat Videos."

This (theoretical) stuff will start out crude, on cards, and at first we will be able to laugh at it. As with the above baseball cards, which show some weird construction of a baseball field in the background but with lines that never seem to add up right with weird shadows and odd grass colors and mental registration confusion and crazy angled lines all over the place until the whole thing looks like a sorta close, AI coder, so not-all-that-close approximation of a baseball field and more like what a baseball field would look like in a 30 year old video game instead. Possibly somewhere in the Topps (digital) Vault there is a base image shot at a Spring Training complex somewhere, the day before Pitchers and Catchers reported. Or, many such images. My dwindling baseball card money remains on Cleveland's place in Goodyear, AZ. Though that could be totally wrong and there is no real base image at all and it is just that small market Cleveland cards were selected for some test runs of this "creative" process. 

It seems to me that over time, AI imagery will continue to evolve until all "Topps" will have to do every Spring is have the players walk through some sort of 3D modeling recording device as used in movies today and the AI will be able to spit out a whole new season's worth of baseball cards of every type - including ones showing "action" inside a Major League Baseball stadium.

The possibilities are as endless as the insatiable demand for more baseball cards, man, make us more baseball cards, we gotta have more baseball cards. OK, Fanatics has your back, valuable card collector, and we can do that for ya. That Hall of Famer with very few existing photographs? We gave his great-great-great-grandson a little pile of money and whaddya know, here we have that famous image from that one newspaper for you re-created in 4K Ultra HD vivid full color detail printed up for you on a baseball card, here yas go. Oh, wait, we only printed 539 copies, so that will be $29.95 please. But since he is your All-Time favorite player cuz your great-grandfather told you stories about him when you were real little, you will just have to have it. And Rookies? Man, wait till you see how many Rookie Cards you can buy, this year. Collect 'em all!

So when your great-grandson some day asks why baseball cards were just so clumsy, back in those archaic early 20s, well, I just don't know what you should tell him. I'm at a loss, all of a sudden, in my lifetime of collecting beloved baseball picture cards. Baseball cards should speak for themselves, and the ones shown above do that, fairly loudly, in my opinion.