Player Collecting the Easy Way

Tonight I completed a most pleasant Baseball Card collecting task — I pulled a plastic-y fresh binder page from a box of Ultra•PRO Platinums, filled it with cards, and placed it in a brand new binder. Hooray!

I have been wanting to install cards on this particular page for a very long time. It is my first Player Collection page. I refer to it that way because this binder will not be full of cards of a single player. Instead it will be full of single pages of a lot of players.

I do have one large and perpetually expanding Player Collection, which is cards of Miguel Cabrera. I quite look forward to assembling those on pages as well, but one can only collect Baseball Cards but so fast of course.

This whole idea of collecting other players, instead of sets, probably started with...

The Card That Started It All

2018 Opening Day "Before Opening Day" insert

This was a small checklist of (theoretically) Spring Training themed cards, befitting the sorta-around-Opening-Day release date for the product. Here, Anthony Rizzo is sporting a green Cubs cap, something only seen on St. Patrick's Day each year, probably not for every team even.

I only know of 2 other cards featuring such caps. A 90s (?) Mets card I am forgetting right now, but do own, and one I suspect I will never own, a 2013 Topps Chrome photo variation of Miguel Cabrera wearing such a cap. Those cards were "case hits" and rarely surface for sale. No one knows the print run of the cards but it could be as low as /25. I am sure one would easily command a 3 figure price when sold. I would quite enjoy owning one for my Miggy collection and am slowly becoming able to entertain the idea of owning a card that costs > $100. But the bigger problem with that card would be ever finding one for sale.

So, I have this cool card of Anthony Rizzo wearing a green Cubs cap. What am I going to do with it?

I like the the Chicago Cubs well enough. If they were still on my TV (if I had a TV) every afternoon essentially as a 'free' part of basic cable service, the way they used to be, I would probably still follow them a fair bit, and that might even motivate me to keep a TV hooked up and in paid service, too. But I can't say even that would result in me assembling a collection of Chicago Cubs Baseball Cards. I am a fan of the Detroit Tigers and that is that.

I could scan it and "cast" it to a wireless digital picture frame that slowly scrolls through a collection of digital images - something I will probably do with a lot of my card scans, some day.

But that still wouldn't solve a key question - where would I keep it? I'm not really into just keeping Baseball Cards in a box that will rarely be opened. The whole point of Baseball Cards is to look at them.

I could put it in a binder page, but what else would go on that page? There are some more "Before Opening Day" cards that I quite like, such as Mookie Betts playing Ping-Pong, & a Detroit Tiger you've never heard of wearing a Spring Training only jersey, a few others. But in typical Topps fashion, the bulk of the images just show baseball players with no particular indication of what is "Before" Opening Day in the image. Do I want a card of Cody Bellinger just sitting on a bench? Nope. I long ago lost the desire to complete insert sets like that one, just, because.

Now 2018 Opening Day is probably the best year of that whole product line, with some 25-ish-% of the set featuring images that are not the same image as the Topps Baseball set that year, probably a record quantity. So that probably leaves a spare binder page slot, iirc, as 2018 Topps Baseball has a sweet design that looks great on binder pages, particularly pages full of essentially photo variations from their more well-known cards in the big set. (This is my semi-annual plug for some cheap, fun, colorful cards you might like to see from your team if you never have.) I look through those on the regular.

But that would still leave that cool St. Patrick's Day card of Anthony Rizzo kind of orphaned by itself in a non-pleasing way.

Finally I realized what the card needed: more Anthony Rizzo Baseball Card neighbors. And thus my Player Collection was born. 

Having a goal in mind when I find a Baseball Card of a player I like, or just a great Baseball Card I want to keep, somewhere, has been a tremendous aid in deciding what cards to keep and which to forward on to new owners, somehow. I can't keep them all, but neither do I wish to stop randomly acquiring new ones, either.

So there we have it. Let's get back to looking at Baseball Cards.

Specifically, the other 8 Anthony Rizzo Baseball Cards on Page #1

2012 Heritage

2013 Topps

Of course I have the 2013 card in a binder already; it is one of my favorites in the 2013 set, which is one of my favorite sets. It is probably also a card that helped inspire me to move into Player Collecting as I knew it would look good with some page-mates.

2013 Topps "World Baseball Classic" insert

I have no idea how Anthony Rizzo (Born 8-8-89 Fort Lauderdale, FL, one of my cards tells me) was eligible to play for Italy's national baseball team, but I don't care, either. And I had to have a card showing off his uniform #, which he picked because it was Hank Aaron's number.

2015 Stadium Club

I probably set that one aside first as an example of a "Pop Up" card, of which there are never very many and my little pile hasn't reached 9 cards yet. Rizzo's 2013 Topps card shown above has a "Great Catch" photo variation short print that I also quite enjoy (yes that blog will return, someday), but that one is best kept with the rest of the cards in that enjoyable checklist. 

2016 Topps "100 Years at Wrigley" insert

I am sure many a Cubs collector has thoroughly enjoyed building that set. That a single-team, 50 card checklist was included in Topps Baseball that year goes to show the nation-wide strength of the Chicago Cubs fanbase. A whole lot of that probably flowed from all those wonderful afternoons watching pretty-much-free baseball games with Harry Caray and Steve Stone. That the whole idea can't happen any more is just kinda depressing as baseball ever so slowly fades from being the National Pastime; and is one reason I no longer follow the Cubs particularly closely. Not because I dislike the Cubs, at all, but because I dislike pondering the state of Major League Baseball in this regard, which Cubs memories just tend to initiate.

Sigh. A few more notes on that insert set - a cool thing about it was of course that after it was released 2016 became The Year for Cubs fans. Also I felt good, in particular, about carefully individually selling each and every one of those cards I pulled rather than just leaving them to waste space in a box somewhere.

As for that card in particular, Anthony Rizzo is well known for off-field efforts helping children fighting Cancer, as explained on the back of the card. It was nice to see a nice tasteful acknowledgement of that on a major league Baseball Card.

2018 Big League "Player's Weekend" insert/parallel

2019 Archives 1958 Topps

This is one of the cards that suddenly made me wish to complete the 1958 portion of Archives that year. I never thought I would warm up to the '58 design, but the simplicity and basic primary colors just make for such great cards, even with the basic posed images. Anthony Rizzo. 1st Base. Chicago Cubs.

2020 Topps

Card Most On The Bubble: Probably this last one. Although I like Anthony Rizzo and Anthony Rizzo Baseball Cards, I like a lot of baseball players and way, way too many Baseball Cards. I can't just run around assembling binders and binders and more binders of all of those players.

So this Player Collection will be a dynamic collection in that I might add a card to it - but only if I like it more than one of the cards already selected. 9 cards, No Mas.

Also for now I have only been setting aside cards as I come across them, by buying new product. Eventually I will have to deliberately shop for cards of a given player to finish out pages, but that won't be the main way I finish these pages. I find it more fun to wait and see what the packs bring me.

The 2020 card is a classic sunlit Cubs day game card, of which there are probably thousands. That basic image does help overcome a too-busy design with that pointless Grey - leave that to the road uniforms & nowhere else, on a Baseball Card, please. Thus I could see finding an Anthony Rizzo Chicago Cubs Baseball Card that I like more than that one.

The 2018 Big League card is from a fun little set of such "Nickname" cards, as used during "Player's Weekend" when the nicknames were on the backs of uniforms — a challenge to well include on a Baseball Card. Big League pulled that off very well by simply printing the nickname on the card instead of attempting to use a photograph of a player's back. However "Tony" is kind of a whatevs nickname for a guy named Anthony, so I could see it getting cut as well, though overall the card is an excellent one.

A final oddity about this page in particular I should share is that I have a copy of an excellent, quite-valuable Anthony Rizzo Rookie Card - a 2011 Update /60 "Hope Diamond" parallel that was a lucky pull from a hanger purchased at Toys R Us in Columbia, SC, while working on the road one winter (never hard to remember precisely where pulls like that happened). I also have pulled 2 different Anthony Rizzo autographs and a couple swatch cards over the years. 

That key RC will be part of a fun project I hope to share with you someday, but I have been hoping that for way too long. Perhaps finally assembling this page will help kick me into gear on initiating that, we'll see.

Most collectors would make those cards (the ones actually worth money - unlike ALL of these 9 cards) the keystones of a Player Collection, but I would just rather not, and that is again that. I like these 9 cards more than those cards.

The Result

It's Baseball Card Season?

My truck outside is turning white as I start into this post - actually, for the 3rd time this year already. But for me, I am, finally, moving back into my favorite hobby: Baseball Cards!

I sure have missed y'all. And, Baseball Cards. I recently returned from 7 straight weeks on the road, working. The summer months were little different. I became so disconnected from Baseball Cards that the other day I noticed I had some unopened packs of Series 2 still sitting on my desk, some 3, or maybe even 4 months since I purchased them. Yikes!

And that whole time I sure have been wanting to just sort a few cards and, of course, share them with - You. So today I enjoyed my modest new supply of free time and used it to purchase some Baseball Cards — brand new ones. Yay!

Let's take a look:

This can only mean the new Archives cards reached my little ole home town. I had already stumbled across one of the featured designs on this always wonderful Internet thing, but I was able to get a blaster box into my grocery cart without seeing the sides of it before I opened the first pack.

1956 drew a mixed reaction. I have always greatly admired everything about 1956 Topps - nothing but key essentials in the information presented, bright, simple primary colors, clean design, and the wonderful dual imagery - like two cards in one, sometimes.

However the use of actual photos for the 'backdrop' rather than ... illustrations? artwork? - I'm not sure how to label that part of a 1956 Topps Baseball Card. I just know that I wish Topps would do up some 1956 cards, that way, once again. And that always nags at my enjoyment of these efforts. Although straight 1956 Topps Baseball hasn't been done as much as, say, 1965, Topps Big from the late 80s has been a repeated (iirc) part of Archives recently, and Topps Big is essentially the same thing.

I will say that these cards feel like an improvement over the 2005 Heritage take in that digital photography 20-ish years ago frequently had a noticeably more harsh feel to it, as compared to analog film. That seems to be far less noticeable, today. Also, Heritage releases were always 100% photographed in February, seemingly at around Noon on a bright sunny day in the south — a far different sunlight than one sees during a baseball game, in late afternoon, in the summer, in the north. Early digital takes from that crisp fresh sunlight were quite often a bit too fresh and crisp, for my taste.

As for this Pasquantino card in particular, it is strange to pull an "RC" after the player's 2nd season in the Majors has already ended. Vinnie appeared in 72 games last year - 2022. I now want to know how things turned out for him in 2023, but for that I will have to wait till February, a fair bit more exciting of a month for Baseball Cards. 

Last year at this time, I was still remembering October play of the player on the 2nd card in the pack -

The best Baseball Cards, are the smiling Baseball Cards.

One thing I will not be scanning for you is the backs of these cards. With this particular go at '56, it is just too sad to not see the basic cartoon-esque sketches illustrating a player's bio or career. Now, there is just a big rectangle of text from Topps Card Back Writer, who is sounding particularly elementary school Book Report-like, this year. Ho-hum.

Ooops.

Recently, I read a list of one of the Top Ten leaders in some stat for the 2023 season, with the player's name and team. Long-time Baseball Card phenom Wander Franco was on the list, but for his current team a snarky web editor decided he was "Out of Baseball." Ouch. 

Archives never stays in one place for long though, inside each pack. Next appeared the design I knew about already, which I was happy about -

Pennants FTW!

I have always quite liked 1965 Topps. I started into a collection of the Heritage set when it came around, but the endless, though historically accurate, head-shots / portraits on every single card eventually disqualified it from being "binder worthy," (i.e. completed) even back the same year it was on the shelves; something even more true today as I have ten-ish more years worth of baseball cards since then.

But I was pleased to get this card. Powder Blue! An entire Redbird! Not a card that will make it into my nascent Powder Blue collection, but I have been wanting a card of this bright future Cards prospect in particular, possibly because 1 or 2 off-seasons ago I was playing armchair GM, like all Baseball fans do, and imagined a trade scenario where Gorman came to my team. I no longer expect that to happen, but I will be turning over Nolan Gorman Baseball Cards for many seasons to come, so I can (maybe) tell my team, see, I told you so.

The next card in the pack cheered me up immensely:

Not because I am particularly a Guardians fan, or had any particular interest in Bo Naylor, but because of that nice authentic distant view of some random mountains in Arizona. For whatever reason, the team for which Topps has most used those horrible repetitive fake backdrops for has been Cleveland. I did see a few more of those in 2023 Heritage, which instantly turned me off from the idea of collecting that set to completion when I saw one in my first pack some six months ago.

So I am really hoping this authentic new brand Baseball Card is a sign that Topps will kick the habit of just-have-the-computer-do-it, and hopefully never ever never do it again. All I can conclude for now is a shruggy, We'll See.

Outside of the old-is-new-again re-use of previous Topps Baseball set designs, Archives also always features oddball designs from Topps history. The enjoyment of these has declined some, for me, along the way into the 2nd decade of this product's existence. Which is probably because of the repeats of a few, and particularly the now never ending streams of these efforts in the Throwback Thursday program, particularly when I discover them a couple years after they are made and discover that only 397 copies of some cool card I want were ever made, so they now cost $19.95, for each single card. I am just not a fan of Limited Edition stuff. 

However I do enjoy routine inserts that are printed in generous quantities, and this year features a great where-did-this-come-from effort:

Freddie Freeman, Star - cuts right to the chase, doesn't it? 

I can't say I had ever seen a 1957 Topps * Hits * Stars * card, but I sure like the concept applied to Baseball. Somehow these remind me of the simple elegance of 1980s Topps Glossy sets available through the mail only, which were even more minimal than this of course. I haven't read the checklist for these inserts but I am hoping there won't be any RC Logo cards in it as I can already tell I want to enjoy a binder page, or 3, full of these.

The next card filled out the mystery of which Topps Baseball set would be in use -

2003 Topps

Surprise, not-surprise when you think about it, given the 2023 Topps Baseball set design, and that third digit in the year count, this year.

2003 Topps is generally off-putting when you first see, or re-see it. I think it has just one simple problem: the blue border is just too dark. I can't explain why black bordered Baseball Cards are quite pleasing, but dark blue bordered ones are, not so much. I sometimes wonder what this design would look like with an MLB style Powder Blue border. Maybe parallels in this year's Archives will help answer that question? Dunno, haven't looked into those yet. I pulled only one parallel in my 2 blasters as Buy One, Get One 50% Off &/or 25% off 2, only if you buy 2 - that sucked me right into doubling down on this sampling. That one parallel was a /199 '65 Foil parallel of Alex Rodriguez in a Mariners uniform. Foil won't answer this theoretical pondering on improving '03 Topps Baseball.

The solution to like / not-like ennui about a Baseball Card design is simple - just look at more of 'em:

This fun base running card shows off the clean dynamism of the design - the inset portrait has those nifty lines suggesting it is scrolling itself off to the left, doubling the sense of motion on this one. This particular card though, suffers from the authentic design choice made back in late 2002 of using the team's primary color for the position and player name area; back then, the Tampa Bay Devil Rays used dark green. I guess this card does help illustrate why the Rays moved on from that poor choice, just as Topps maybe shouldn't have picked dark blue to bound every card in this set.

Just one bright light in my first pack of 2023 Archives, that fantastic Freddie Freeman, Star card - which is brilliant without even having a (graphic) star on it. 3 intriguing sets to ponder all over again though, so methinks we should just simply check out pack #2, which starts off with a Classic -

A real signature.

A great thing about a fresh supply of 1956 Topps cards is that it will greatly assist one of my current deepest challenges in collecting Baseball Cards, which is increasingly based on assembling 9 cards of a player, or an image theme, or a certain Highlight, or whatever I deem should fit onto a page. Except — I now only put Horizontal cards on a page with other Horizontal cards, in my slowly growing all-Horizontal binder. I expect it will look fantastic on a coffee table, someday, if I ever have a coffee table.

But assembling 9 pleasing Horizontal cards of a single player is a serious Baseball Card collecting challenge. Check it out for yourself amidst any particular Player Collection you might have rolling. I have a casual one for Bob Gibson, almost exclusively of post-career cards, and as I type I'm not sure if any of that little stack of cards is even a Horizontal. But when that decision comes, this card is making the starting 9. And I sure never expected to start wondering if a 1956 Topps style card is a Night Card as this Gibson has that look, especially compared to the next card in the pack:

Ain't no Smile like a '56 Topps Smile?

On this one I think the pure field background is much more reminiscent of '56 than a photo with spectators in the background. I am now taking a short break to scroll through some random '56 Topps cards that I sure wish I owned...

...that was pleasant. Turns out, the Mantle card had fans on it that year, too. How quickly I often forget super expensive cards I will never own. The bulk of '56 did not however seem to have paying customers in the sub-image, unlike those first 2 '56s at the top of this post.

Maybe that wise break time decision generated some Topps Mojo for me -

What year is this?

I have always figured Topps Favorite David Wright would make a triumphant return to my packs of baseball cards, though I didn't expect that would be via a Topps Certified Autograph Issue, hard-signed / on-card, complete with a uni # inscription. Just about as perfect of a David Wright keepsake as one could hope for, if one wanted a David Wright keepsake. Note this isn't part of the long-running Fan Favorite series in Archives, which would be denoted by the classic Archives stamp on the card as debuted over 20 years ago now. This is an autographed version of the 1957 Topps * Hits * Stars inserts I like so much. Archives is fun like this, quite often. It takes a minute, or 5, to get onto the next card after pulling one like that, but I made it:

An even better Powder Blue effort, with 2 complete Redbirds, while Contreras sports double team color compression sleeves. Which Cardinals? The St. Louis Cardinals. I love Baseball Cards that use a road uniform when the card itself doesn't incorporate the city name in the design, like this one. Oooohhhh to have a Powder Blue parallel of a card like this. Are you listening, Topps, it's me, Base. 

Such great base cards in this pack -

Cardinals Hot Pack!

I can just see the sly grin on the face of the Topps Sheet Construction Manager who carefully placed this card on the sheet such that it will come off the cutting machine right after the previous card. Well done. My 2nd favorite division is the NL Central - I have friends or family who are fans of every team, so it never matters who is top dog in the division - I get to root for all of the teams, at the same time. Makes for fun packs of Baseball Cards, a little unlike pulling cards from my team's division:

How quickly we forget.

There are a lot of reminders in this Archives release - Roger Clemens in a Blue Jays uniform, Alex Rodriguez back in Texas, probably several more I haven't seen yet. A nice touch here is that, if I recall correctly, David Ortiz was still a Minnesota Twin in 2003 Topps, so it appears the Topps Set Constructor did a little requisite homework this year. I also quite like, and hope, a new trend is developing in this history mining portion of the world of Baseball Cards, to wit: using a live game action image on a set design that never included them. This was the case in the "1965 Redux" inserts from just a single year ago, as well as the "1952 Redux" effort last year as well. Gives the design a fresh look, and that's, a Good Thing.

Another nice road alternate uni image choice up there too. Where do the Twins come from? Just look at the card, silly. I keep on lookin' at em, all my life...

Hall of Fame Triple Header

Archive can have some serious Star Power like this, at times. Only crazy expensive sets of cards, where each "pack" has just 3 cards in it (as I have heard), usually give you much chance to see this many Hall of Famers sequentially in packs. Though even in such products, everyone usually wants the Rookie Cards anyway. This pack, didn't have any - 

- how long has it been since you opened a pack of Baseball Cards, sans RC?

This is a well selected, nicely sunlit image; you can almost hear the crowd hush a bit as King Felix goes into his wind-up. But yet another example of where primary team color, Teal, doesn't quite make a 2 + 2 = 4 effort when paired with the dark blue border. This one actually looks better in-scan, than it does, in-hand.

That was quite a pack. 6 Hall of Famers, a solid contemporary All-Star, and 2 solid Hall of Very Good well regarded retirees as well. As much as I would like to scan every card in every pack I open, you might prefer just checking out the other key ingredients, like more inserts:

Do we even need the player name printed?

Now there is another triumph of design simplicity. This is a retail only, "69 Topps Team History" foil insert, which particularly "pops" in bright daylight. I sometimes wonder what was going on in 1969 at Topps, which seems to be the source year of a whole lot of experimental Baseball Card products.

These cards look very nice, in-hand, and I will surely see who represents the Detroit Tigers on this checklist, but I'm not sure even this classical design victory is going to make it to my coffee table in the Old Folks home. Close.

These, however, definitely will -

Just had to share the only other card of this I have, so far. Now that, is a Baseball Card. This release has lots of those, like this fun card:

The fun, however, really begins on the back of the card -

These are called "89 Double Headers" and I am possibly more intrigued to just discover the original inspiration for these, a semi-routine occurrence opening Topps Archives. I'm guessing the way-back-in-'89 versions didn't partially ruin this swell idea with an overload of legalese copyright icons on the 'back' - which will probably keep these from making the starting rotation on that coffee table.

Those 89DH are fun cards though, seems to be a not-uncommon criteria in this stroll through the Archives. Sometimes, the results of that make me a touch, 'jelly' - in the modern vernacular. This happens when a Topps product that -should- have been revealed to me in my actual Youth, is instead discovered some 44 years later:

A "1979 Topps Comic"

I have never heard of these before. I am always intrigued by hand-drawn cards, but for these, I will have to look at more of 'em, to form an opinion, I think. And that's not even all the inserts in this product, as Hobby Boxes have yet more goodies to stumble across, a wandering I haven't started, yet.

However this blog is supposed to be all about dat bass, so let's see some early Highlight Reel -

These two cards both stood out to me as possibly being the result of a 21st Century image tweaking technique, that being the colorizing of photos originally shot in Black & White. Just a guess, but these cards work, particularly the Speaker, in capturing the '56 gestalt very well.

All Old-Time Baseball Players, for old people? No, Archives does mix it up well with active players; don't forget that first pack way back up there. I did find a true treasure amidst the Young Guns:

2023 Detroit Card of the Year

I am years and years behind on examining a year's worth of Topps Tigers cards. But I doubt you will see more of Detroit on a baseball card this year than on this one.

This late season release is routinely going to include the Rookies of the Year, which have clear betting line leaders by the time this is assembled, and 2023 Archives delivers again -

More Smile FTW

Even if a Rookie of the Year appearance is a year late. So strange that a player can win that award a whole year before his Official Rookie Card© is ever created. Even stranger to pull a ROY RC -after- his 2nd season of play. Such, is Baseball Cards.

And what's up with that teeny-tiny Braves team logo on that card? Per chance a slight design snafu back there in the fall of 2002? I don't remember; those dark blue borders just lull me to sleep, a little. But then, the little things start to poke me back to enjoying these:

How about that new Guardians icon, Baseball Cards?

Me likey. These 'red team' cards finally start to gel as they begin to dispel the 2003 Topps Blues-

Now, we are cooking with gas.

These things just destroy the seriously over-busy 2023 Topps Baseball design. Let the team icon do it's professionally designed job, simply and effectively, give me the position and the name, some team color action, and, I'm Good. I didn't expect to be desiring a few binder pages of these cards when I saw that Taylor Ward card, but 2 blasters in, I would like some more fresh 'head shot' cards, just like these.

These brand new 2023 2003 Topps Baseball Cards are making me want a 2023 Archives, Series 2 release (pretty please?), even though I went into this rip thinking I knew the 65s would rope me in, right away. '56 Topps re-efforts I think will always pale to the originals with those quasi-Art, all Action backgrounds, whenever just regular photos are used instead. A whole bunch of my other Topps Baseball cards have Action photos for me to look at, whenever I wish. But '56 Topps, sigh...

Still, I expect the 100 brand new '56s will manage to make a few delightful curated pages in that Horizontal binder on the coffee table, while the shelves nearby will likely hold a full run of some new sweet '65 and '03 Classics:

Say Good Night, Satchel.

Opening Day is Opening Day

Happy Baseball everyone!

I can no longer open Opening Day on Opening Day, so I settled for the next best thing, I guess — opening some more Series One.

The cards I most want to see on Opening Day are of course, cards from My Team, and Topps came through:

Now here was a nice burst of optimism - a bright sunny baseball card for the player Tigers fans hope will win the Comeback Player of the Year award after a straight up disintegration last year as Bad Luck seemed to attack Meadows from every direction.

Usually I figure pulling a player's brand new baseball card on Opening Day is going to be an excellent omen both on Opening Day and going forward. And today that did not disappoint: Meadows went 3-for-4 with a Double and two Singles.

Tigers cards this year are going to occasionally fool people into wondering: what the heck happened to Kris Bryant? And how did he end up in Detroit before whatever happened? The "KB" shoulder patch the Tigers wore for the 2022 season was a memorial tribute for Kimera Bartee, who died unexpectedly during the off-season some 15 months ago, shortly after being named the Tigers new regular First Base Coach. Bartee played Center Field for the Tigers for most of one season in the mid-90s; a season which mostly eluded my baseball card collecting efforts.

For today's festivities I purchased 2 36-card "fat" / "value" packs but I doubt that second appellation will be used much any more. This type of packaging has been absent from retail baseball cards for a few years now and I am happy to see it return, for use in stores that decline to offer the regular single/loose pack of 16 cards. These "value" packs now cost $9.99 where I live and are actually one of the more expensive ways to purchase cards, on a per-card basis. Blasters have a slightly higher per-card cost, but the $4 16-card pack is a better deal (added one of those to the menu today as well) and the 72-card "hanger" box is still the best deal overall, though hangers hand up the duplicate strings of cards at a much faster clip.

One Detroit Tigers card isn't enough for Opening Day however; there had to be more amidst 88 cards and 30 teams, I hope -

Did I pull today's starting Pitcher? Nope. Brieske had to open the season on the IL after seemingly earning a bullpen spot as a "swingman" ready to jump in the rotation as soon as necessary (presumably quite soon given how MLB Pitching works in the 2020s) after an accelerated Rookie season as a starter last year, made necessary by how MLB Pitching works these days. Naturally, given the workings of Pitching lately, his Rookie year was shortened by injury as well. At least I have another nice sunny Tigers card to enjoy while he joins most every other recent young Tigers starter working through the rehab process to try Pitching again, someday.

2-for-2 on bright sunny baseball cards though, could Topps keep this bright motif going?

womp womp womp

This has got to be the most Sad Trombone card I have pulled in a while. This is my first Tigers duplicate this year after I pulled it on a different Opening Day - the Opening Day of 2023 Baseball Card season back in February. As I mentioned then, the head shot on these cards can really swoop in and rescue a mediocre baseball card like this one. And maybe this poor Rookie Card image will work reverse magic - Greene had a great Spring and could well be primed for a great Sophomore campaign and will hopefully anchor Center Field in Detroit for many seasons to come.

Going 3-for-88 on Tigers cards on Opening Day seemed just exactly perfect in a 30 team League and would actually be a BC+ score of somewhere  a bitover 100, a composite stat I just made up. Given some of the 86 cards being inserts, I beat the odds finding Tigers for a change — a rare thing in Topps checklists for quite a while now.

But I do always hope to see some cards of the opponents on this momentous baseball Day, and there Topps let me down as I found no Tampa Bay Rays to absorb, a BC+ of precisely 0 I guess. Thus the Tigers shoulda won today, 3-0 in true magic baseball card fashion? Nope. The ever-solid Rays beat My Team in workman like fashion with the same number of Hits as the boys from Motown, but 2 of theirs were Home Runs. Sigh.

Now the other thing I love to do on Opening Day with all my brand new baseball cards is figure out how accurate the cards are - does the card in my hand have a matching line in a Box Score today? Who plays this game, anyway? That's why I buy the baseball cards. 

Given that so many brand new baseball cards are Rookie Card cards these days, I decided to siphon those off my nice little 88 card pile of baseball information and see what's happening with the New Guys. That idea was prompted by this outstanding baseball card:

Did he make the Box Score? Yes. However that was neither as an SS or a 3B but rather at DH. I have no idea who played those 2 positions for the Orioles so clearly I will need some more brand new baseball cards. The O's are a young team and it can take me a few years of reading baseball cards to get a good handle on such clubs.

I'm still only lukewarm on these 2023 Topps Baseball Cards with all the odd geometry but the clear view of each player's face down there in the bottom left corner sure does make for excellent Rookie Cards. Like all Topps designs, the picture of the baseball player is the most significant element of the card, ultimately. It will take me a while yet to decide on collecting or not collecting this set in it's entirety. I do like to know what the players look like, and Topps comes through on that point this year in a very well-done way. 

For the rest of these 'rooks, I will go with a purely fair alphabetical order:

Did he make the Box Score? Yes. I am still a little shaky on Red Sox players since last year on the Opening Day wrapper there were 2 Red Sox that I still can't identify with certainty. Casas was a first round draft pick for Boston & in general the back of the card paints a bright future ahead here. This card again shows off the value of the bonus head-shot given the way the new 2020s batting helmets reduce face visibility in live action photos. Overall a solid find in a pack of brand new baseball cards. Unlike this next Red Sox card...

Did he make the Box Score? Nope. Nor for his new team. There was no way Topps was going to pass up their opportunity to finally make this baseball card, given Downs' first name. Even though the Red Sox DFA'd him before Christmas. Maybe, and that is a weak maybe, we will see him in Update sporting a Nationals uniform. You can't win 'em all and in the Rookie Card card era, some checklist spots are just a Sac Fly so the RC logo can appear in every pack and everyone can feel like they "got something" worth money, somehow. Topps is keeping the sun shine going at least -

Did he make the Box Score? No. A bit of a surprise to me, given what the back of this card tells me: 2.1 WAR in a little more than half a season's worth of Rookie Year games last year. I had to choose carefully tonight; rather than checking in with Tom Hamilton on the Cleveland radio broadcast I selected the A's broadcast instead. I like that radio crew a lot, too — plus Topps advertises on A's broadcasts regularly. Some other day with a Guardians game on the radio or some future set of baseball cards might tell me more about this cheerful looking baseball player I have never seen before. Another solid new baseball card, which kept right on appearing today:

Did he make the Box Score? Yes. This player I was familiar with in the more regular way - from following games. Given KC's co-habitation with Detroit in the AL Central cellar lately, I probably pay more attention to Tigers-Royals games, given that the Tigers have a better chance to win those. If memory serves, the Royals basically fielded their 2023 squad routinely last September; in general an optimistic set of names. This does fail to explain why I didn't know who Oscar Gonzalez was however. 

And there are plenty of "divisional" games, or were, as those have been dropped from 18-19 to 13-14 such games this year. This will make baseball cards even more important to me in helping me follow the teams in my own division given two less series against each this year. I like how this card mixes up the photo style on the head shot; I hope there are more of these. I'm ready for more boys of summer, always frequently seen on Chicago cards -

Did he make the Box Score? No. I do know most of the Cubs players, courtesy mostly of Topps baseball cards, but an "OF" has room for 3, so - this was a could-go-either-way prediction, based on what the back of this card tells me. I expect I will see this player on more baseball cards and it is now a given that My Team will automatically play the Cubs, whenever that is, so maybe by that time he will be in a game I catch. I am ready, now, when his name is called. Meanwhile that lucky old sun just keeps rolling around in my "value" packs...

Did he make the Box Score? Not surprisingly at all, Nope. Another duplicate from my First Pack of 2023, I made that prediction with ease as soon as I saw this card 6 weeks ago, given how many Pirates middle infielder Rookie Card cards Topps handed me last year. I also couldn't check in with Bob Walk and Joe Black on the radio today for some Pirates news but that also wasn't necessary. The Pirates seem as doomed as ever to have large quantities of Rookie Card cards in my packs of baseball cards but despite that same-as-it-ever-was conclusion I still don't understand this particular baseball card. Three At Bats in a previous season should not a Rookie Card make, in my opine. It can't stay sunny every day of the baseball season I guess:

Did he make the Box Score? No. Although my 2023 First Card, A's Rookie Card card Catcher Shea Langeliers, is playing as I type, I didn't expect another RC Logo Catcher would appear today. The Rockies are near impossible for me to follow; I don't even have a clue who calls their games as if I am awake for a West Coast game I'm going to go with Jon Miller on the Giants game or the A's crew I am listening to right now. Baseball cards gave me just enough Rockies knowledge to know that Serven is likely the back-up Catcher, though he certainly earned a Rookie Card card after 62 games in The Bigs last year. I'm guessing this photo was taken early in a game, when the usual just-after-lunch set of clouds tends to drift across the Front Range — this card awakens some fond memories of life in Colorado though that flows also from another card in these packs. The West is so big, and baseball is more mysterious out there. I am always more grounded back in the Middle West -

Did he make the Box Score? That's a negatory. 9 At Bats last year so, you do the math. This is a great baseball picture card with the perfect photo truncation of Swaggerty's last name on his uniform and the excellent flowing lines that made me instantly turn it over to see how many Home Runs this player hit last year. Sigh; the answer was: zero. This is only a so-so baseball card, to my taste, given that pointlessly squished capital "P" there and all that weird geometry going all dizzy around it. Is that the secondary team color there around the home plate "OF" positional designation? Why can't that just be regular Pirate Yellow? Topps sure seems to love these unknown Pirates, considering they are enshrining them in baseball card history by giving them a checklist spot in The Topps Baseball set, my Gold Standard of baseball information, though I find myself ever more often wondering about that concept.

Not all Rookie Card cards can be Home Runs, even when they sorta come close like that last card. I have been slightly stacking this little deck of cards by showing all the hitters, which is because even the most rock solid young Pitchers can make an Opening Day starting rotation but not today's Box Score. So let's move on to the guys who start each & every "play" in the game of Baseball:

Did he make the team? Yes. I already knew from my numerous Rookie Card inserts last year who would be starting for Cincinnati today: Hunter Greene, recipient of much Topps love in 2022. I cheated and went to non-baseball card resources to confirm what this card suggests; 19 starts last year for Ashcraft, a very solid total for a Rookie. And quite a solid Reds Rookie Card card with Mr. Redlegs making an appearance, the requisite blurry red seats in Cincinnati, and a straight fantastic look at their official Team Socks. This one is likely to make the page I have showing off the best examples of each. Great set of lines on this card and a nice photograph obviously catching the live baseball game focus of Ashcraft. Who was that guy that was just complaining about this 2023 Topps Baseball design a paragraph back? I do love those empty seat cards Pitchers tend to get, and all the surreality that can go on behind them:

Did he make the team? Sort of - 40 Man roster. I like several things about this card. The uniform. The multi-color pastiche behind Hughes. The bright green grass and more horizontal-than-vertical lighting telling me this is a Night Card. Which is more intriguing because I have no idea what this Cubs uniform is. A Night Card from Wrigley? Throwback? New? Home? Away? The cap is obliterated by the stadium lights. Such a mystery. I will need more baseball cards to see something new (or old) for the Cubs, a very old baseball club. I will be watching.

I also like that this card exists - Hughes pitched 57 Innings out of the bullpen last year, and that is an accomplishment definitely worth a Rookie Card. Something I fret about when I pull Rookie Card cards like those very marginal Pirates cards. Relievers are baseball players too, even though they are far and away the most unpopular position on the roster. Only the Closer gets much appreciation from the fans, and only the near perfectly successful Closers on the level of Mariano get unrequited love. All other relievers can only lose the game for Their Team, in the minds of most fans. The Manager should have never changed the Pitcher, so obvious. Managers are always so dumb. They change the Pitcher and the team loses the game. No one wants Manager cards either.

I also like that Hughes is a Michigan born player. This will give me something to follow when the Cubs<>Tigers games appear sometime this year. The head shot on this one also appears not-posed, which is a good thing in this set. The Cubs routinely get great baseball cards. All that red, white, and blue - man I'm ready for some Apple Pie now. 

However I still have no idea why Hughes didn't make the 26 Man roster; baseball cards can't explain all baseball news of course. I still need those basic who-are-these-guys deets, particularly down on the South Side -

Did he make the team? Sort of - 40 Man roster. I count that as a quasi-yes because I feel sure there will be some Rookie Card cards in my packs this year featuring a player no longer on a 40 Man roster, if I were to investigate each one. Martin is a young work-in-progress Starter for the White Sox; I suppose 14 games last year, mostly Starts, is every bit as Rookie Card worthy as the Beau Briskie card for the Tigers. Both of their careers could go either way right now. 

I would note that this card also features a non-posed image for the head shot, but that doesn't work on this card as it seems to clearly use a live game image with a classic bit of "Pitcher's Face" so familiar from action image Topps Baseball Cards for decades now. These are not always complimentary for the subject. A strong image line flow from the glove to the baseball fortunately keeps one's gaze away from the weird mess that the bottom of 2023 Topps can distract the viewer into sometimes. The image reminds me of a Quarterback about to launch a Bomb way downfield though, which is weird. The dirt on the mound also adds to the weirdness here. Sorry, Davis, Rookies deserve better. Let's see if the Sun might come back out -

Did he make the team? Yes. And the Box Score. Although the back of the card seems to indicate Winckowski came up as a not-all-that-succesful-Rookie-Starter last year (probably more of those workings of modern Pitching for the Red Sox last year, too, I guess), today he threw a respectable inning out of the bullpen in Boston. But since the home team was already behind and indeed lost the game, few will remember that and my hunch is Josh Winckowski will pitch a good amount this year, but likely won't be seen on baseball cards again until 2024 Update, maybe.

I do always like the cards with the solid color Alternate Uniforms though I will never understand Topps strange desire to use just bits and pieces of team logos. This is another one where the solid photo selection and cheerful head shot create a nifty baseball card for me to follow the game of baseball with. I know well I will be soaking up another stack of these things, soon...